This is Gentoo's testing wiki. It is a non-operational environment and its textual content is outdated.
Please visit our production wiki at https://wiki.gentoo.org
Talk:I3
This is a talk page. Please add newer comments below older ones, and sign your comments using four tildes (
~~~~).
When adding a new section (at the bottom of the page), please mark it as "open for discussion" by using {{talk|open}} so it will show up in the list of open discussions.More krey's notes in wiki pages!
Doesn't work on my setup change it to your best judgement. Arigato <3
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/I3#Moving_around
META+V = Split window vertically.
- DOES NOT @$%! WORK!* - Krey
META+H = Split window horizontally.
- DOES NOT @$%! WORK!* - Krey
--Kreyren (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Still relevant?
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/I3#i3status
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/I3#i3blocks
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/I3#i3lock
There are no USE flags present.
--Kreyren (talk) 08:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean by "still relevant" ?
- the packages are still maintained and usable
- i3status does actually have a flag
- shouldn't the package lists have the standard info box for packages even without flags?
Glop102 (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
i3block and i3lock doesn't have any USE flag, so why is {{USEflag|package=x11-misc/i3lock}} used?
--Kreyren (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I would imagine it is likely that it was easy to copy/paste from another section. Or it might be to maintain consistency. If you know how to get it to link to package listing with a similar style but without the empty box for use flags, then it seems obvious to replace it. Personally I would like to have something in each package section that looks roughly the same just to be consistent, whatever that style choice may be. (i know nearly nothing about doing wiki edits so suggestions highly appreciated)
Glop102 (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I did my best, if anyone knows how to improve it feel free to. :D